Thursday, March 30, 2017

JRN 300: You've Got Numbers

This was from JRN 300 section coordinator (my boss for 300) Joe Grimm on March 30, in a message copied to J-school director Lucinda Davenport:

We have had some good days lately, but what is notable is that we often have a single big story on those days, and it is usually not one that is prominently displayed on the site.

These are some (mostly from Omar's Lansing team):

March 29: 1,309, 625 on the River Walk story
March 28: 1,370, 521 on River Walk
March 27: 1,616, 1,029 on the homeschooling story
March 24: 595, 73 homeschooling
March 23: 1,069, 467 homeschooling
March 22: 950, 281 homeschooling

Tell your students that people are reading them!

(High hopes for an upcoming Chick-fil-A story! Those always do well.)

--
Joe Grimm 

Michigan State University School of Journalism


***********

Then, this came from Lucinda:

Wow!  Those ARE good numbers.


Good to see, know and thanks to you and students.

Lucinda

Dr. Lucinda D. Davenport
Director & Professor
School of Journalism
College of Communication Arts & Sciences
Michigan State University


Congrats, everybody!

JRN 300: More Stuff

Don't forget ...

  • EVERY STORY HAS TO HAVE A PICTURE! One that has been taken by you, not one stripped off the Internet (which is probably a federal violation of copyright law if you do that).
  • LET'S HAVE A HUMAN BEING SOMEWHERE IN THE PICTURE! No more cars without people, buildings without a person out front, etc.
  • WHO DID YOU INTERVIEW? WHERE'S THEIR PICTURE? If nothing else, you can always shoot the people who you interview.
  • WHERE IS YOUR SENSE OF STYLE? AS IN, AP STYLE? Still seeing too many AP Style errors, especially those involving names, titles, numerals, addresses and percent. Please carefully review those sections in your AP Stylebook.

Wednesday, March 29, 2017

JRN 300: You've Got Readers!

This, from JRN 300 section coordinator Joe Grimm:

That story is getting a load of readership. No. 1 again yesterday by a mile. Seems like you have hit a national audience ... 

-- 


Plus, this comment on our site regarding this story:


Keep it up, everybody!

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

JRN 300: A Pretty Good Example ...

... of where our final drafts should have been, in terms of level of reporting, writing and multimedia elements:

Business Enterprise Program helps visually impaired find work


Lansing, Mich.- An employee at Constitution Hall in downtown Lansing stops to get a coffee before work at the snack bar. As they are paying for their drink, the employee notices ithat the man working the cash register is blind.

These visually impaired employees are a part of the Business Enterprise Program (BEP) of the (Michigan) Bureau of Services for Blind Persons. This program offers employment opportunities for blind and visually impaired people.

Professor at McMaster University and expert in developmental disabilities Penny Salvatori said that job opportunities are very limited. A few employers like Wal-Mart have policies to employ people with disabilities; however, their disabilities tend to be minimal.

“I’m not familiar with the BEP program; however, all of these kind of programs are essential in order to fight for equal opportunities and make a difference in the lives of people with disabilities,” Salvatori said.


About BEP
The BEP specifically licenses blind individuals to run and manage their own food service establishment.

This program was established after Congress passed the Randolph-Sheppard Act of 1936. This provided opportunities for blind individuals in federal locations. The Public Act 260 of 1978 established opportunities for State of Michigan properties.

Visually impaired individuals can become part of the BEP by taking initial testing and then a training program. Once in the program, operators find a job by using the bid line. This phone line lists all facilities up for bid. An operator can call and say they are interested and one person is chosen for the location.

The Michigan Business Enterprise Program Manager James Hull said that the program provides training, initial inventory of products for sale, equipment and a location to set up and start operations of their own business.

Robert Essenberg has been an operator in the program since 1985. Essenberg started out in a Muskegon county building and moved around to different locations around the state such as Grand Rapids and Pontiac until he ended up in Lansing at the Operator Center cafeteria and snack bar. Essenberg is also an operator at the Michigan Secretary of State and the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services in Lansing.

The BEP provides employment opportunities at cafeterias and snack bars in federal and state buildings, as well as vending operations in these locations and rest stops on highways.

“The primary function of the program is to assist blind people in getting remunerative employment,” Hull said. “Blind individuals have the highest unemployment rate in the country, it’s roughly 80 percent, so this affords them to start their own business to provide not only for themselves but for their families and assist them in getting off public assistance.”

Essenberg said he found it difficult finding employment in the field he graduated in being blind. The BEP has helped Essenberg find a job when he graduated and has provided him with a steady income for the last 30 years.

“It (BEP) opened up an opportunity for blind individuals to enter the workforce or enter self employment with a level of security that they wouldn’t have if they were going out and opening up a business in the state on their own,” Essenberg said.

Going forward, Hull said they are trying to set up opportunities to run commissaries in county jails and eventually state prisons. They are also looking to set up kiosks that would be run by BEP licensees where incarcerated could make calls and emails.

BEP also signed a contract introducing state of the art vending, which will initiate greater vending operations.

Meet some of the operators
While the BEP has operators all over the state of Michigan, it has a large presence in the Lansing area. There are many people who have been affected by the program and would like to see it grow in the future.

Samuel Tocco
Tocco first learned about the BEP in the late ‘90s. In 2002 he looked more into it, went through the initial testing to enter the program, and took a four-month training course.

Tocco started out in downtown Detroit and then had a vending route for a few years after. Now Tocco lives in Lansing and is the operator of the snack bar, vending and catering services in Constitution Hall and the Romney Building in downtown Lansing.

While primarily working at the cash register, Tocco also manages four employees and makes sure the business runs smoothly overall.

“It has been good for me as it turns out, but I definitely had to work my way up,” Tocco said.

When talking about the BEP, Tocco said his job in Lansing has helped him and he makes good money. However, it hasn’t always been that way. Some of the places Tocco said he worked at when he first entered the BEP were not very good. The location he is at now is one of the better ones in the program. It took Tocco three moves and a few years to find a good location.

“It’s a good program, but if there are 60 locations, there’s a lot of them that are really little that they are looking to combine into bigger ones,” Tocco said.

Tocco said he thinks that is the direction that they should go in. There would not be as many jobs, but they would be good jobs. A lot of the stands make a couple hundred dollars a day and it is hard to get by on that.

“You take these little ones and you’re broke and you get into debt and borrowing money from people and you’re trying to survive and have a place to live and before you know it your shelves are getting less and less empty, people are complaining and it just spirals out of control,” Tocco said. “Some of that could be avoided if they started in a place that makes decent money to begin with.”

Richard Heiser
Benjamin Ploch
Roxanna Mann


JRN 300: Final Project Problems

Too many times, the response to a final project draft was a mediocre grade, followed by something to this effect:

There isn't much reporting, which gets me thinking, how can we write something when we don't know what we have from our sources? There really isn't anything to evaluate here. It's nice writing, but it's almost entirely free of any substance. It's empty calories without thorough reporting.


And that's a problem.


That's because journalism isn't about writing; it's about reporting. We don't write based on our artistic ability to write; we write based on what we discovered by talking to people and looking at documents and considering statistics and such. The structure of the story is entirely determined by the facts we have.


So it was pretty troubling to me seeing people write drafts with one or even no interviews at all! If we're writing based on assumptions and then plugging in quotes where we assume they belong, that's not journalism.


Journalism is, first we get all the facts; then, we figure out what the story really is -- and not necessarily what we assumed it would be -- and only then do we decide what the lede and the structure of the story are.


What we're doing is like taking a scientific theory and writing it up as a fact before we've even run any tests. At best, it's worthless in absence of any experimenting to prove or disprove it; at worst, it's misleading.


Along those lines, what I was primarily grading on was proof that you had done substantial reporting, primarily in the form of the number and quality of interviews to date. For us to be legit journalists, that is the litmus test we need to ace every time.


There's no substitute for reporting.


Tuesday, March 21, 2017

JRN 300: Some Problems

Some problems with pitches as of late. Problems include:
  • Some people didn't turn in a pitch. Too many people,  actually. This is no time to fall behind; each weekly story is worth 7 percent of your final grade. That means missing just one weekly story can seriously dent your final grade. Don't let that be you. If you haven't, get me a pitch ASAP. I won't allow more than one makeup story submitted per week once our weekly story schedule is finished, so don't count on being able to send me a rush of stories at the end. I won't accept a late rush.
  • People aren't carefully checking with their peers on story plans. I literally had one entire group pitch me basically the same story idea this week. Only the first one received was approved. Please make sure you're not stepping on each others' toes.
  • People aren't carefully checking the site to make sure their pitch hasn't already been done. One pitch I received was done by a teammate just a few days ago. 
  • Pitches are getting to be too business-oriented. Most people don't live their lives based on businesses; they live lives based on trends and issues. That's why early this semester we had those exercises where you went out and asked people, what's bothering them? What's frustrating them? What are they confused by? And so forth.
  • Getting too many story ideas centered around businesses is usually indicator you're not reaching out to everyday people enough and you're over relying on just looking around the physical space of your beat. Looking around space is fine if you're looking for trends and issues -- why is it so dead in this downtown all the time? Traffic is horrible here; why is that? The streets are crappy; what are they gonna do about potholes? -- but we need to look more at the people in the foreground and how they are interacting with their environment and maybe a little less at the background and what businesses happen to be standing there. 
It's not unusual that at this point in the semester we're struggling for story ideas. That's because the good ideas we got from our initial site visits have all been used up, and now we're at the bottom of the barrel.
The correct way to solve this problem is to do what we did before:
  • Environmental observation: visit our beats and look around, and try to notice what things stand out that are worth looking into,
  • Identifying concerns of everyday people, by talking to them and polling them.
  • Looking at data (Census, crime, etc.) to see what we can identify was a newsworthy topic
  • Looking at records (budgets, city council meeting minutes and agendas) to see what trends and issues can be discovered there.
Stories aren't discovered in newsrooms; they are discovered by getting out in the real world. That's why news organizations have reporters; to get out there and act as scouts and spies and discover things. If we could avoid that process there would be no need for reporters at all; editors could just dream up ideas in the newsroom. 
So let's make sure that doing person-on-the-street polls wan't just something we were doing for a grade early on. Let's redo all the things we did at the start and get a fresh set of ideas so we can finish the semester strong.
As always, please see me if you have any questions or concerns. 

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

JRN 300: An Announcement From The J-School

The Mid-Michigan Pro Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists will host a screening of the documentary Tickling Giants at 7 p.m. Wednesday, March 15, in the Newsroom as part of its efforts to recognize Sunshine Week. The film is made by a producer of The Daily Show and it's about the Egyptian Jon Stewart. Here's a trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVwUrbGcxZ4&feature=youtu.be/#1

Extra credit will be given for those taking a selfie from the event and sending it to me along with a sentence saying what you got out of it via email at omars@msu.edu. Thanks!