Recently, I got this email form one of youze:
Do I have to meet with other "national correspondents" even though we obviously won't be working the same beats? I wasn't totally sure from your blog post. Thanks!
This was my reply:
I don't think it would hurt for you guys to form a Facebook page or Google group and help each other brainstorm and bounce ideas around. You'll be facing similar issues and even similar types of stories, even if your beats are different. Thanks!
Wednesday, May 31, 2017
Tuesday, May 30, 2017
JRN 300: We Must Discover What We Don't Already Know
Recently, I got this question from one of youze:
When you say "schedule meetings" with people this week for information, what exactly would I be asking them to meet for/what would the meeting be about if I have no story yet?
Good question. And this is my reply, which we all should carefully consider:
Everything we are doing this week is about identifying and building sources so we can pick their brains about what is happening in their communities. We're wanting to see if they can help us identify what trends and issues are happening in their communities; what questions and challenges face the communities they live and work in; and general info about what somebody covering the community needs to know about its history and priorities and challenges and desires. So, these meetings will be part meet-and-greet and part brain-picking. The whole point is for us to discover what we don't already know about a community. The root word of news is new, and that's no accident. We need to discover things. Hope this helps!
Really, this class isn't mostly about news writing (though that's a big part). It's about reporting, and more specifically, honing the art of being thrust into a community where we have to discover news and come up with story ideas that aren't just based on an event taking place or something already reported by other media or something obvious.
We need to unearth news. We need to discover things. We need to find out what we don't know we don't know.
That's journalism.
When you say "schedule meetings" with people this week for information, what exactly would I be asking them to meet for/what would the meeting be about if I have no story yet?
Good question. And this is my reply, which we all should carefully consider:
Everything we are doing this week is about identifying and building sources so we can pick their brains about what is happening in their communities. We're wanting to see if they can help us identify what trends and issues are happening in their communities; what questions and challenges face the communities they live and work in; and general info about what somebody covering the community needs to know about its history and priorities and challenges and desires. So, these meetings will be part meet-and-greet and part brain-picking. The whole point is for us to discover what we don't already know about a community. The root word of news is new, and that's no accident. We need to discover things. Hope this helps!
Really, this class isn't mostly about news writing (though that's a big part). It's about reporting, and more specifically, honing the art of being thrust into a community where we have to discover news and come up with story ideas that aren't just based on an event taking place or something already reported by other media or something obvious.
We need to unearth news. We need to discover things. We need to find out what we don't know we don't know.
That's journalism.
JRN 300: Your Homework For The Week of 5/30
A reminder: you will be doing visits to your assigned beats this week. Beat assignments are as listed in a blog post last week.
This summer, what you will be doing is working as a staff reporter for a public news Web site run by MSU's School of Journalism.
This week, we will have a number of in-person exercises designed to help us get accustomed to our beats, which in journalism is what we call our coverage territories or topics. For those assigned to the Lansing beat, our beat is the actual City of Lansing (since you are students who are here in the Lansing area this summer). For national correspondents, it's the area in and around where you are living this summer.
What I need for you to do is to make on-site visits to your beats on Tuesday, May 30; Wednesday, May 31 and Thursday, June 1. This will be our work for the week. The Lansing team may go as a group if you'd like. Spend some time walking around your community and doing interviews -- at least 1-2 hours per day.
Then, there are three things I'd like you to submit to me via a Word document with the following heading:
Your name
Date
JRN 300
Your beat
In the document, include:
1. A list of observations. Tell me five things you noticed about your community. For example, was its downtown busy or dead or booming or kind of sad? Why or why not? Great story ideas can come from simple environmental observation, so look for things that stand out and are crying out for an explanation.
2. Questionnaire responses. I want you each to interview five random people on the street and get answers to the following questions from each: what drives you crazy about living or working here, and why? What excites you about living or working here, and why? What would you like to see changed here, and why? What do you want to never see changed and why? And what question or questions do you have about living or working here that you'd like to see answered, and why?
You may tell people you are MSU journalist students doing research for a public news Web site run by the school.
3. A list of possible trend or issue story ideas, based on what you found from environmental observation and interviewing passers-by. Please list five ideas. I will not hold you to doing any of these story ideas (though you absolutely may do them), but I want to get a sense of what you're seeing and how your observations are helping you develop things we can actually report on in the heart future.
Then, email me your submissions to omars@msu.edu. Your deadline will be Friday, June 2 at 9 a.m.
I also need you to make contact with your other group members; please see last week's blog post on your group assignments for details on why and how to do that.
Questions? Call or text me at 702-271-7983; email me at omars@msu.edu, or schedule ban appointment to see me at my office in CAS 360.
Good luck, everyone!
This summer, what you will be doing is working as a staff reporter for a public news Web site run by MSU's School of Journalism.
This week, we will have a number of in-person exercises designed to help us get accustomed to our beats, which in journalism is what we call our coverage territories or topics. For those assigned to the Lansing beat, our beat is the actual City of Lansing (since you are students who are here in the Lansing area this summer). For national correspondents, it's the area in and around where you are living this summer.
What I need for you to do is to make on-site visits to your beats on Tuesday, May 30; Wednesday, May 31 and Thursday, June 1. This will be our work for the week. The Lansing team may go as a group if you'd like. Spend some time walking around your community and doing interviews -- at least 1-2 hours per day.
Then, there are three things I'd like you to submit to me via a Word document with the following heading:
Your name
Date
JRN 300
Your beat
In the document, include:
1. A list of observations. Tell me five things you noticed about your community. For example, was its downtown busy or dead or booming or kind of sad? Why or why not? Great story ideas can come from simple environmental observation, so look for things that stand out and are crying out for an explanation.
2. Questionnaire responses. I want you each to interview five random people on the street and get answers to the following questions from each: what drives you crazy about living or working here, and why? What excites you about living or working here, and why? What would you like to see changed here, and why? What do you want to never see changed and why? And what question or questions do you have about living or working here that you'd like to see answered, and why?
You may tell people you are MSU journalist students doing research for a public news Web site run by the school.
3. A list of possible trend or issue story ideas, based on what you found from environmental observation and interviewing passers-by. Please list five ideas. I will not hold you to doing any of these story ideas (though you absolutely may do them), but I want to get a sense of what you're seeing and how your observations are helping you develop things we can actually report on in the heart future.
Then, email me your submissions to omars@msu.edu. Your deadline will be Friday, June 2 at 9 a.m.
I also need you to make contact with your other group members; please see last week's blog post on your group assignments for details on why and how to do that.
Questions? Call or text me at 702-271-7983; email me at omars@msu.edu, or schedule ban appointment to see me at my office in CAS 360.
Good luck, everyone!
JRN 300: A Reminder About Our Beats
Just to be clear on our beats: if you are on the Lansing team, your beat is specifically the City of Lansing. It is NOT any of Lansing's suburbs, like East Lansing. Our stories are to be about trends and issues in the City of Lansing, and the people in the City of Lansing.
And there are reasons for that: we want you exploring areas that you don't already know, and where you don't know people. That way, we can work on our ability to find stories and develop sources, as opposed to leaning on places and people we already know. In the real world of journalism, most of the time we'll have to go in blind to places and still develop sources and stories. That's what we'll practice here.
For those of you who are national correspondents, I encourage you to get away from your central towns and explore the newsiest towns in your area. Those towns are teeming with trends and issues to be explored.
Plus, if you simply rely on covering areas you're more familiar with, you won't develop your skills at finding story ideas and sources in unfamiliar places. You may do fine in this class, but then you'll get your ass kicked badly on your first internship and your first job, which wouldn't be good at all.
And that's why we're doing this class in the first place. You're worried about your grade this semester; I'm worried about how you'll do the day after your graduation.
And there are reasons for that: we want you exploring areas that you don't already know, and where you don't know people. That way, we can work on our ability to find stories and develop sources, as opposed to leaning on places and people we already know. In the real world of journalism, most of the time we'll have to go in blind to places and still develop sources and stories. That's what we'll practice here.
For those of you who are national correspondents, I encourage you to get away from your central towns and explore the newsiest towns in your area. Those towns are teeming with trends and issues to be explored.
Plus, if you simply rely on covering areas you're more familiar with, you won't develop your skills at finding story ideas and sources in unfamiliar places. You may do fine in this class, but then you'll get your ass kicked badly on your first internship and your first job, which wouldn't be good at all.
And that's why we're doing this class in the first place. You're worried about your grade this semester; I'm worried about how you'll do the day after your graduation.
Friday, May 26, 2017
JRN 300: Your Groups And First Assignments
This summer, what you will be doing is working as a staff reporter for Spartan Newsroom, an online news site run by MSU's School of Journalism. One is Listen Up Lansing, which has been a site that's been open for a few years now, and regularly reports on trends and issues in the City of Lansing.
I'd like everyone to take a look at the site here. Please take a deep look at the types of stories and issues the site has covered in the past. The ones that involve trends and issues are the types of stories we want to do this summer.
I'd like everyone to take a look at the site here. Please take a deep look at the types of stories and issues the site has covered in the past. The ones that involve trends and issues are the types of stories we want to do this summer.
I'd also like you to review the site page that focuses on news from the City of Lansing, which is almost entirely trend and issue stories. These are the kinds of stories I want us developing and doing on our beats.
Some of you will be assigned to cover the City of Lansing beat for the site, and others will be assigned to geographic areas in and around where you are this summer. Assignments are as follows:
Lansing staff reporters (covering the City of Lansing ONLY):
Ingham County reporter (covering the county but NOT the cities of Lansing or East Lansing)
National correspondents (areas of coverage in parentheses):
Next week, we will have a number of in-person exercises designed to help us get accustomed to our beats, which in journalism is what we call our coverage territories or topics. Lansing, our beat is the actual City of Lansing (since you are students who are here in the Lansing area this summer). For our national correspondents, it's the area in and around where you are living this summer.
Before then, we have one online exercise for you to do: I want you to use Google and the U.S. Census Bureau Web site at www.census.gov to explore your beat, and come up with 5 interesting facts, figures and footnotes about your beat. It could be random facts or statistics or historical matters. But do see what you can find, and don't just rely on the Census, Wikipedia and the City Hall Web sites; do some exploring and see what you can find.
Don't use news articles from news sites to act as a cue; we need to find our own stories, and not ones that have already been reported on.
Then, I want you to write your answers in a Word document with the following heading:
Your name
Date
JRN 300
Your beat
... and then email it to me at omars@msu.edu. Your deadline will be Wednesday, May 31 by 9 a.m.
Next, I want your beat to meet together in-person or video conference via Google Groups or some other remote conferencing system. Please share what you discover and start helping each other out as needed regarding story ideas and sources and sharing resources like rides and such (there is one person in the Lansing group who does not have a car, so ride-sharing would certainly be helpful, though that beat can also be covered by using CATA to get around).
Also, going forward you will be responsible with knowing what story ideas your group is working on at any given time to ensure two people aren't working on the same story idea.
Then, on the week of May 30 I want you to make on-site visits to your beats on Tuesday, May 30; Wednesday, May 31; and Thursday, June 1. This will be our work for the week. The Lansing team may go as a group or groups if you'd like. Spend some time walking around your community and doing interviews -- at least 1-2 hours per day. You may also schedule and arrange meetings with newsmakers on your beats, like mayors or police chiefs or business leaders and such.
Then, there are three things I'd like you to submit to me, using the same format as the previously-disclosed assignment. (These have to be submitted individually with your own work and answers, separate from those of others, even if you go as a group).
They are:
1. A list of observations. Tell me five things you noticed about your community. For example, was its downtown busy or dead or booming or kind of sad? Why or why not? Great story ideas can come from simple environmental observation, so look for things that stand out and are crying out for an explanation.
2. Questionnaire responses. I want you each to interview five random people on the street and get answers to the following questions from each: what drives you crazy about living or working here, and why? What excites you about living or working here, and why? What would you like to see changed here, and why? What do you want to never see changed and why? And what question or questions do you have about living or working here that you'd like to see answered, and why?
You may tell people you are MSU journalist students doing research for possible stories for a public news Web site run by the school. And that should be your standard identification throughout the semester; you're not just doing stories for a class; the stories we do will be posted to a news sites read by the public. This isn't pretend-we're-doing-news; we are doing real news stories that real people will really see.
3. A list of possible trend or issue story ideas, based on what you found from environmental observation and interviewing passers-by. Please list five ideas. I will not hold you to doing any of these story ideas (though you absolutely may do them), but I want to get a sense of what you're seeing and how your observations are helping you develop things we can actually report on in the heart future.
Then, email me your submissions to omars@msu.edu. Your deadline will be Friday, June 2 at 9 a.m.
There will be blog updates next week where we get more into what we'll be doing through the semester, and resources that will help you do that. So please do keep checking the blog every weekday for updates (but not Monday, due to the holiday).
Questions? Call or text me at 702-271-7983; email me at omars@msu.edu, or schedule an appointment to see me at my office in CAS 360.
Good luck, everyone!
Some of you will be assigned to cover the City of Lansing beat for the site, and others will be assigned to geographic areas in and around where you are this summer. Assignments are as follows:
Lansing staff reporters (covering the City of Lansing ONLY):
- Cassie Bondie, bondieca@msu.edu
- Dan Denova, denovada@msu.edu
- Kaiyue Zhang, zhangk24@msu.edu (also covering Xi'an, China for part of summer)
- Julia Tonionl, toniolo1@msu.edu
- Britney Vanderkodde, vande737@msu.edu
- Xavier Thompson, thom1487@msu.edu
Ingham County reporter (covering the county but NOT the cities of Lansing or East Lansing)
- Nick Tomayko, tomaykon@msu.edu
National correspondents (areas of coverage in parentheses):
- Alyssa Richardson, richa827@msu.edu (Flint, Mich. area)
- Simone Fenzi, fenzisim@msu.edu (Birmingham, Mich., Detroit, Mich. and Milan, Italy areas)
- Neena Rouhani, rouhanin@msu.edu (Rochester Hills, Mich. and Detroit, Mich. areas)
- Antonio Ferraro, ferraro8@msu.edu (Sheby Township and Detroit, Mich. areas)
- Chase Michaelson, micha151@msu.edu (Seattle Wash. area)
- Madeline Stamm, stammmad@msu.edu (Buffalo, NY area)
- Amy Davis, davisa85@msu.edu (Traverse City, Mich. and northern Michigan areas)
- Patricia Davis, davisp18@msu.edu (Traverse City, Mich. and northern Michigan areas)
- Kathleen Kennedy, kenne418@msu.edu (St. Clair, Mich., Michigan "Thumb" and Detroit, Mich. areas)
- Kayla Hinton, hintonka@msu.edu (Virginia Beach, Virg., Warren, Mich. and Detroit, Mich. areas)
- Trevor Toczydlowski, toczydlo@msu.edu (Grand Rapids, Mich. area)
Next week, we will have a number of in-person exercises designed to help us get accustomed to our beats, which in journalism is what we call our coverage territories or topics. Lansing, our beat is the actual City of Lansing (since you are students who are here in the Lansing area this summer). For our national correspondents, it's the area in and around where you are living this summer.
Before then, we have one online exercise for you to do: I want you to use Google and the U.S. Census Bureau Web site at www.census.gov to explore your beat, and come up with 5 interesting facts, figures and footnotes about your beat. It could be random facts or statistics or historical matters. But do see what you can find, and don't just rely on the Census, Wikipedia and the City Hall Web sites; do some exploring and see what you can find.
Don't use news articles from news sites to act as a cue; we need to find our own stories, and not ones that have already been reported on.
Then, I want you to write your answers in a Word document with the following heading:
Your name
Date
JRN 300
Your beat
... and then email it to me at omars@msu.edu. Your deadline will be Wednesday, May 31 by 9 a.m.
Next, I want your beat to meet together in-person or video conference via Google Groups or some other remote conferencing system. Please share what you discover and start helping each other out as needed regarding story ideas and sources and sharing resources like rides and such (there is one person in the Lansing group who does not have a car, so ride-sharing would certainly be helpful, though that beat can also be covered by using CATA to get around).
Also, going forward you will be responsible with knowing what story ideas your group is working on at any given time to ensure two people aren't working on the same story idea.
Then, on the week of May 30 I want you to make on-site visits to your beats on Tuesday, May 30; Wednesday, May 31; and Thursday, June 1. This will be our work for the week. The Lansing team may go as a group or groups if you'd like. Spend some time walking around your community and doing interviews -- at least 1-2 hours per day. You may also schedule and arrange meetings with newsmakers on your beats, like mayors or police chiefs or business leaders and such.
Then, there are three things I'd like you to submit to me, using the same format as the previously-disclosed assignment. (These have to be submitted individually with your own work and answers, separate from those of others, even if you go as a group).
They are:
1. A list of observations. Tell me five things you noticed about your community. For example, was its downtown busy or dead or booming or kind of sad? Why or why not? Great story ideas can come from simple environmental observation, so look for things that stand out and are crying out for an explanation.
2. Questionnaire responses. I want you each to interview five random people on the street and get answers to the following questions from each: what drives you crazy about living or working here, and why? What excites you about living or working here, and why? What would you like to see changed here, and why? What do you want to never see changed and why? And what question or questions do you have about living or working here that you'd like to see answered, and why?
You may tell people you are MSU journalist students doing research for possible stories for a public news Web site run by the school. And that should be your standard identification throughout the semester; you're not just doing stories for a class; the stories we do will be posted to a news sites read by the public. This isn't pretend-we're-doing-news; we are doing real news stories that real people will really see.
3. A list of possible trend or issue story ideas, based on what you found from environmental observation and interviewing passers-by. Please list five ideas. I will not hold you to doing any of these story ideas (though you absolutely may do them), but I want to get a sense of what you're seeing and how your observations are helping you develop things we can actually report on in the heart future.
Then, email me your submissions to omars@msu.edu. Your deadline will be Friday, June 2 at 9 a.m.
There will be blog updates next week where we get more into what we'll be doing through the semester, and resources that will help you do that. So please do keep checking the blog every weekday for updates (but not Monday, due to the holiday).
Questions? Call or text me at 702-271-7983; email me at omars@msu.edu, or schedule an appointment to see me at my office in CAS 360.
Good luck, everyone!
Thursday, May 25, 2017
JRN 300: A Few Things To Keep In Mind ...
... before we start working on any stories. For example:
A few things about writing exercises:
1. You will be held to professional standards regarding deadlines and accuracy. That means ...
2. We strictly enforce deadlines. News is a deadline business, so when we say due no later than 9 a.m. Wednesday I mean it's received by me no later than exactly 9 a.m. Wednesday. Not 9:01 on Wednesday. Not that you sent it at 9 a.m. Wednesday. Missing a deadline -- even by just one second -- will result in an automatic 0.0 on all assignments.
Missing deadlines -- even by seconds -- is unacceptable in journalism. Is there a journalistic value reason for that? You bet. An editor can work with a piece o' crap story, no matter how bad it is. They can fix it and clean it up sufficiently as long as they have it. But they can't work with nothing. Nor can you fill up a newspaper page or a TV script with nothing.
Think about it: have you ever watched the 11 o'clock news, when they've started the show by saying, "Our scripts aren't ready yet; come back in 10 minutes"? Me neither. That's because it simply isn't allowed to happen. And those who may be tardy with the occasional deadline are soon asked to find something else to do for a living.
It's a lesson I'd rather have you appreciate the severity of in this class, than on your first internship or job. Here, it's a shitty grade on one assignment. Out there, it's a derailment of your professional career.
It's your responsibility to make sure you don't forget an assignment, as it is in the real world. It's your responsibility that you're not even one second late on your deadline, as it is in the real world. And as in the real world, it's your responsibility to make sure your assignment is routed to the right place, which in this case is omars@msu.edu.
Them's the breaks, folks. It sucks, but let's at least learn from these errors so we don't repeat 'em.
3. We strictly enforce accuracy. Journalism isn't about writing; it's about getting it right. Getting things right is key to credibility, and there's no such thing as a small error. (After all, if you can't get the little things right, why would readers believe we're correct with the big stuff?)
To motivate you to make fact-checking routines a standard part of what you do, in this class on any assignment any fact error (which we call fatals) will automatically result in a 1.0 on the assignment.
Harsh? Kinda. But it's to get you to embrace good fact-checking habits as part of your routines. And it's not as harsh as what you may face professionally. When I was still a professional journalist, one newspaper I worked at had this rule: in any one year a first "fatal" would result in a verbal reprimand; a second a written reprimand; a third meant I needed to write up an action plan to avoid fatals; a fourth fatal meant an unpaid suspension; and a fifth fatal meant I could be fired.
And that was on writing between 200 and 250 stories a year!
So, the margin of error is tiny. And the problem is, in a natural state speed and accuracy do not go well together. Yet that's what we have to reconcile in doing journalism. We have to get used to writing fast AND correctly. I'd rather have you learn a harsh lesson (and improve from there) when the consequence is a bad grade on one assignment, rather than getting fired from your job.
Please take the fact-checking habits we've blogged about earlier and work them into your routines. And try to dedicate as much time to fact-checking as you do writing.
For example, let's say you have one hour to do an assignment. Ideally, I'd like you to spend the first 15 minutes going over the story information and making sure you understand what you are about to write about. Then, spend the next 30 minutes writing. After that, spend the last 15 minutes proofreading your work.
That way, in the end you spend one minute doing quality control for every minute spent writing. And if it means your story seems short, so be it. I'd rather have you write short than wrong.
We can't just turn on good habits like a light switch when we turn pro. We need to start building good habits now. That's why these rules are in place, and that's why this class exists: so that on the day after graduation, you are immediately ready and experienced in what you need to do for the rest of your career.
A few things about writing exercises:
1. You will be held to professional standards regarding deadlines and accuracy. That means ...
2. We strictly enforce deadlines. News is a deadline business, so when we say due no later than 9 a.m. Wednesday I mean it's received by me no later than exactly 9 a.m. Wednesday. Not 9:01 on Wednesday. Not that you sent it at 9 a.m. Wednesday. Missing a deadline -- even by just one second -- will result in an automatic 0.0 on all assignments.
Missing deadlines -- even by seconds -- is unacceptable in journalism. Is there a journalistic value reason for that? You bet. An editor can work with a piece o' crap story, no matter how bad it is. They can fix it and clean it up sufficiently as long as they have it. But they can't work with nothing. Nor can you fill up a newspaper page or a TV script with nothing.
Think about it: have you ever watched the 11 o'clock news, when they've started the show by saying, "Our scripts aren't ready yet; come back in 10 minutes"? Me neither. That's because it simply isn't allowed to happen. And those who may be tardy with the occasional deadline are soon asked to find something else to do for a living.
It's a lesson I'd rather have you appreciate the severity of in this class, than on your first internship or job. Here, it's a shitty grade on one assignment. Out there, it's a derailment of your professional career.
It's your responsibility to make sure you don't forget an assignment, as it is in the real world. It's your responsibility that you're not even one second late on your deadline, as it is in the real world. And as in the real world, it's your responsibility to make sure your assignment is routed to the right place, which in this case is omars@msu.edu.
Them's the breaks, folks. It sucks, but let's at least learn from these errors so we don't repeat 'em.
3. We strictly enforce accuracy. Journalism isn't about writing; it's about getting it right. Getting things right is key to credibility, and there's no such thing as a small error. (After all, if you can't get the little things right, why would readers believe we're correct with the big stuff?)
To motivate you to make fact-checking routines a standard part of what you do, in this class on any assignment any fact error (which we call fatals) will automatically result in a 1.0 on the assignment.
Harsh? Kinda. But it's to get you to embrace good fact-checking habits as part of your routines. And it's not as harsh as what you may face professionally. When I was still a professional journalist, one newspaper I worked at had this rule: in any one year a first "fatal" would result in a verbal reprimand; a second a written reprimand; a third meant I needed to write up an action plan to avoid fatals; a fourth fatal meant an unpaid suspension; and a fifth fatal meant I could be fired.
And that was on writing between 200 and 250 stories a year!
So, the margin of error is tiny. And the problem is, in a natural state speed and accuracy do not go well together. Yet that's what we have to reconcile in doing journalism. We have to get used to writing fast AND correctly. I'd rather have you learn a harsh lesson (and improve from there) when the consequence is a bad grade on one assignment, rather than getting fired from your job.
Please take the fact-checking habits we've blogged about earlier and work them into your routines. And try to dedicate as much time to fact-checking as you do writing.
For example, let's say you have one hour to do an assignment. Ideally, I'd like you to spend the first 15 minutes going over the story information and making sure you understand what you are about to write about. Then, spend the next 30 minutes writing. After that, spend the last 15 minutes proofreading your work.
That way, in the end you spend one minute doing quality control for every minute spent writing. And if it means your story seems short, so be it. I'd rather have you write short than wrong.
We can't just turn on good habits like a light switch when we turn pro. We need to start building good habits now. That's why these rules are in place, and that's why this class exists: so that on the day after graduation, you are immediately ready and experienced in what you need to do for the rest of your career.
JRN 300: Our WordPress Accounts
For this class, we will be filing and posting our stories via the WordPress platform. Some of you have had WordPress for other classes, and for some of you this is your first time.
Either way, you now have an account (whether it is your old one or one I created for you) with your suer name being your MSU PID and your temporary password as either sparty2017woo or sparty123woo. PLEASE USE THE NEW PASSWORDS TO GET INTO YOUR ACCOUNT AND THEM IMMEDIATELY CHANGE YOUR PASSWORD TO SOMETHING ELSE AS THESE ARE TERRIBLE PASSWORDS.
Your password has been changed to the temporary ones whether or not you have previously had an account.
You can further set up your account (and include a photo of yourself!) by clicking here:
http://news.jrn.msu.edu/student-journalist-resources/setting-up-or-updting-your-profile/
For a refresher of how WordPress works for class, click here:
http://news.jrn.msu.edu/student-journalist-resources/
To log into the WordPress dashboard, click here:
http://news.jrn.msu.edu/wp-admin
Hope this helps!
Either way, you now have an account (whether it is your old one or one I created for you) with your suer name being your MSU PID and your temporary password as either sparty2017woo or sparty123woo. PLEASE USE THE NEW PASSWORDS TO GET INTO YOUR ACCOUNT AND THEM IMMEDIATELY CHANGE YOUR PASSWORD TO SOMETHING ELSE AS THESE ARE TERRIBLE PASSWORDS.
Your password has been changed to the temporary ones whether or not you have previously had an account.
You can further set up your account (and include a photo of yourself!) by clicking here:
http://news.jrn.msu.edu/student-journalist-resources/setting-up-or-updting-your-profile/
For a refresher of how WordPress works for class, click here:
http://news.jrn.msu.edu/student-journalist-resources/
To log into the WordPress dashboard, click here:
http://news.jrn.msu.edu/wp-admin
Hope this helps!
JRN 300: What, Exactly, Is A Trend/Issue Story?
In this class, what we want to do is produce trend or issue stories, and not event or happenings stories.
An event or happening story is about something taking place: a public event, a press conference, a business opening, etc. It's focused on who-what-when-where.
And that type of journalism isn't of much value these days, when groups and organizations can put out such basic news on their own Web sites and/or social media pages. People can easily Google on their own to get those basic facts about an event upcoming or just-occurred. People really don't need journalism for that anymore.
What people need is to discover patterns happening in their midst, and making sense of events and happenings in terms of what they mean beyond the simple event. It's getting more into the whys and hows, and more into general topics and how they broadly influence everyone as opposed to a limited event with limited impact.
For example, looking at past JRN 300 stories one trend identified was the lack of diversity in Meridian Township. Click here for the story.
Another false from Meridian Township is the growing trend of students utilizing the "schools of choice" program. Here's that story.
A trend and issue story can be based on a happening, but we need to build way beyond just the simple fact that something is happening and get the pros and cons and why does this matter? answered, like with this story about a proposed express bus system through the Lansing area.
Or here, where we're not just noting that road repairs are planned for Lansing; we are examine what exactly they are -- are are NOT doing -- and why.
An event or happening story is about something taking place: a public event, a press conference, a business opening, etc. It's focused on who-what-when-where.
And that type of journalism isn't of much value these days, when groups and organizations can put out such basic news on their own Web sites and/or social media pages. People can easily Google on their own to get those basic facts about an event upcoming or just-occurred. People really don't need journalism for that anymore.
What people need is to discover patterns happening in their midst, and making sense of events and happenings in terms of what they mean beyond the simple event. It's getting more into the whys and hows, and more into general topics and how they broadly influence everyone as opposed to a limited event with limited impact.
For example, looking at past JRN 300 stories one trend identified was the lack of diversity in Meridian Township. Click here for the story.
Another false from Meridian Township is the growing trend of students utilizing the "schools of choice" program. Here's that story.
A trend and issue story can be based on a happening, but we need to build way beyond just the simple fact that something is happening and get the pros and cons and why does this matter? answered, like with this story about a proposed express bus system through the Lansing area.
Or here, where we're not just noting that road repairs are planned for Lansing; we are examine what exactly they are -- are are NOT doing -- and why.
JRN 300: More Examples Of Trend And Issue Stories
These are from students who in a past semester covered Meridian Township (which includes Okemos and Haslett in the Lansing area). Please note these stories aren't fixed on an event; rather, they are on an ongoing trend or issue that may use an event as an example or a starting point, but then delve more deeply into the issue itself.
Also please notice the range of sources, including people who are leading the issue, affected by the issue, acting upon the issue, and neutral experts who help contextualize the issue. These sorts of stories are the ones we're aiming to do off of our beats.
Examples include:
The difference between a weekly story and a final project is that we report much more broadly and thoroughly on a topic we really think is the biggest trend or issue we come across. Some examples from the Meridian team include:
Also please notice the range of sources, including people who are leading the issue, affected by the issue, acting upon the issue, and neutral experts who help contextualize the issue. These sorts of stories are the ones we're aiming to do off of our beats.
Examples include:
- Distracted driving in Meridian Township
- Human trafficking in Meridian Township
- The township's pothole problems
- Girls' prep sports embraced by Haslett residents
- Dog poop is worse than you think
- Okemos High School is highly-ranked; why?
The difference between a weekly story and a final project is that we report much more broadly and thoroughly on a topic we really think is the biggest trend or issue we come across. Some examples from the Meridian team include:
- The lack of diversity in Meridian Township
- Whether the township really needs an express bus system
- The "schools of choice" program growing in the township
Please do carefully look over all these previous stories and see if it gives you a better sense of what we're aiming to do here. As always, if you have any questions or concerns please get a hold of me ASAP. It's hard for me to give you workable advice the day before something is due, since most solutions involve having to do more reporting. So don't wait until the last minute to start working on your stories!
"I couldn't get a hold of a source" will never be an acceptable excuse, just like in the real world. That's because if there's a big story people want to know about now, we need to find sources now. The audience won't care anymore tomorrow.
Really, what journalists are paid for isn't to write or shoot or edit stories; it's to problem-solve all the things that go into having stories to put together: finding sources or backup sources, getting info in a timely manner and on deadline, etc. Those are the skills we will be practicing here.
Plus, journalists are paid to find stories that people either don't already know (and can't Google for on their own) and to answer the whys and hows about things they do notice. If all we needed to do was who-what-when-where and to restate things already easily knowable, then there would be no need for reporters: people could Google on their own for everything they need, and editors wouldn't need reporters to go out and find things if everything could be found online.
Again, these are the skills we're working on this summer. If you're not perfect the first or second time out, that's fine. Just make sure we are learning to be resourceful, hard-working, problem-solving reporters, and that we take any lessons we learn from one exercise and apply them in future exercises so we can do better the next time.
The time for us to refine these skills is now. If you wait until your first job or even your first internship, it's too late.
Story Focus: Six Questions To Help You Find The Best Angles
6 questions that can help journalists find a focus, tell better stories
by Tom Huang
As an editor, I try to ask good questions. That’s because I’m a curious person, overflowing with sentences that end in question marks.
It’s also because, as Poynter’s Roy Peter Clark once wrote, “Teachers and editors best operate as resources for writers, by conferring with writers, not telling them what to do.”
I don’t mean to say that I never give writers suggestions. But I try to start with questions that spark a writer’s imagination. I push the writer to think harder about the story’s theme. I encourage the writer to try fresh approaches to storytelling.
We know the basic questions that journalists strive to answer when chasing a news story — questions starting with “who,” “what,” “where,” when,” “why” and “how.”
Here are a few other questions I like to ask writers — usually right before they start their reporting, and then right before they sit down to write.
Even if you’re on deadline, try having a 10-minute conversation guided by these questions. As an editor, the coaching you provide on the front-end can often save you time revising the story after the fact.
How would you tell this story to a friend? I like asking this question because it encourages the writer to think about the most interesting and relevant nuggets of the story. We’re good at considering the news value of a story, but we’re not always as good pondering the “Why should the reader care?” part. Having the writer imagine telling the story to a friend can help him or her think about why we should care. This approach can also help the writer move away from any jargon and bring a conversational tone to the piece.
What would an early headline be for this story, knowing that the headline is not set in stone? This is a variation on the question, “What is this story really about?” Boiling the premise down to five or six words can help the writer sharpen the story’s focus. In my newsroom, we’re asking reporters and line editors to write early Web headlines and short summaries on top of their stories. This is largely for production reasons, but the added benefit is that we’re encouraging writers and editors to get at the heart of the story earlier in the process.
What surprised you? As much as I hate to admit it, many, if not most, of the stories that journalists produce are written in a predictable way. Asking about “surprise” can help the writer shed his or her journalistic mantle, at least for a moment, and just react to the story’s events as a human being. Who were the quirky personalities you met? What was a jarring quote you heard? What did you not see coming? What interesting details and anecdotes do you have in your notebook that you left out of the story, and how do we get one or two of them back in?
What are the unanswered questions? As journalists, we’re not always good at spelling out what we don’t know in a story, especially if it’s a breaking story. Oftentimes, we try to write around the holes. Better to be clear and ’fess up in the story about what remains to be explained and clarified. This question also prompts the writer and editor to compile a list of questions for any follow-up stories.
How do we bring something new to this story? Your best reporters want to be challenged. And chances are, if they are veterans, they have tackled a story similar to the one they are tackling now. What better way to challenge them than to ask them to come up with a fresh approach to the story? The approach could involve words, but it could also involve photography, graphics and online elements. This question will also help writers think about collaborating with visual journalists across the newsroom.
What’s the glimpse of wisdom we can offer? The best stories for me are those that not only tell readers something they don’t know, but also resonate with readers because they touch upon a universal theme. They offer readers a “glimpse of wisdom” — an important lesson that the people we’re writing about have learned — whether it’s about love or loyalty, betrayal or resilience. Those are the most satisfying stories for me. Equipped with cable TV, laptops, tablets and smart phones, our readers are lost in a sea of information. They are hungry for context and meaning. The “glimpse of wisdom” is one of the most important things we can offer them.
JRN 300: Not Just Great Sports Reporting Advice; It's Great Journalism Advice, Period
The secret to covering the Super Bowl? Break away from the pack
By Ed Sherman
A new book has a telling passage that shows how much the media and the Super Bowl has changed. In "When It Was Just A Game: Remembering the First Super Bowl," author Harvey Frommer writes about what passed for media day prior to the Green Bay-Kansas City game in Los Angeles in 1967.
The reporters were invited to the Packers team hotel in Santa Barbara. Vince Lombardi told the players to hang around in their rooms. The legendary coach then passed out the room list to the reporters and sent them on their way.
In the book, Jerry Magee, formerly of the San Diego Union-Tribune, says: "We went up to Bart Starr’s room and knocked on his door. Starr opened it, saw who we were, and said, 'Hey, come on in, fellas. What can I do for you?'"
Try to imagine Bill Belichick doing something similar today. "Hey fellas, Tom Brady is waiting for you in room 258."
Of course, the NFL needed to do everything it could to hype Super Bowl I, which didn’t even come close to selling out the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum. The magnitude and significance of the game has grown exponentially since then, and that includes the media coverage.
This week, the media horde will descend on California's Bay Area to cover Denver versus Carolina in Super Bowl 50. Those massive numbers make it perhaps the worst setup in sports from a coverage standpoint.
Yet, according to a couple of veteran Super Bowl reporters, it is possible to write original, enterprise-type stories while veering away from the media pack.
The first rule: Don’t be part of the pack
"If you’re in an interview situation with 100 media members, everyone is going to use the same quotes," said Bill Plaschke, the longtime columnist for the Los Angeles Times. "That’s a nightmare."
"I never go to Media Day [when players in full uniform are met by wall-to-wall reporters on the Tuesday before the game]," said Bleacher Report’s Dan Pompei, who will be covering his 29th Super Bowl. "It’s a clown show. I’ve never been one to follow a crowd."
The second rule: Do as much advance work as possible before Super Bowl week
"If you wait until you get there, you’re dead," Plaschke said.
Plaschke and Pompei use the week between the conference title games and the Super Bowl to work the phones to get people to talk about their subjects. For a story on Carolina coach Ron Rivera, Pompei sought to get insights people who impacted his career, such as Andy Reid, Norv Turner, and Mike Ditka.
"It is essential to do your homework," Pompei said.
One of the Plaschke’s favorite stories was on Bears offensive lineman Roberto Garza, who became the first Latino to play in the Super Bowl. Plaschke stopped in Garza’s hometown outside of Beaumont, Texas on his way to the 2007 game in Miami.
Prior to 2013 Super Bowl week, Plaschke tracked down relatives for the person who was murdered in the 2000 case involving Baltimore linebacker Ray Lewis. Lewis didn't face trial, but the incident still hangs over him.
Plaschke and Pompei also try to locate people who knew a particular player from way back when.
"They might not be participants, but they usually have some great stories to tell about them," Pompei said.
"There’s the reflection from the glow of the Super Bowl, and everyone wants to talk," Plaschke said. "Then when you get to the Super Bowl, you use the player to fill in the gaps."
The third rule: Do stories beyond Peyton Manning and Cam Newton
You don’t need a star player to write a good story.
"Sometimes, I prefer to talk to a backup running back who is by himself," said Pompei, who recently launched a new website, DanPompei.net. "The Super Bowl is one of the few times we get to spend time with assistant coaches. I ask them a lot of questions. Often, they are very good talkers."
The fourth rule: Make sure the story is relevant
Thinking out of the box is great, but make sure you still can see the box. During a Miami Super Bowl, Plaschke drove into the Everglades to do a column on an alligator wrestler.
"I wanted to do something different," Plaschke said. "But this guy had no interest in the Super Bowl. He wasn’t even going to watch the game. I wrote the column, and I realized, 'This column is completely irrelevant.' You’ve got find some connection to the game."
Plaschke has a rule he always follows. "I always tell myself, 'Don’t do the alligator wrestler story,'" he said.
The fifth rule: Keep digging
There's a good reason why many veteran reporters list the Super Bowl as their least-favorite event to cover.
"As the media and the Super Bowl has evolved, the pack has become bigger and bigger," Pompei said. "It’s a hurdle to tell good stories."
Yet Pompei and Plaschke contend the good stories are out there. They just require creativity and extra effort to find.
"Football is such an inhumane game with all of its violence," Plaschke said. "But the Super Bowl is the one time in the year where you can humanize these guys. Just by being in the Super Bowl, these guys are studs. People want to know about them."
Wednesday, May 24, 2017
Sources: We Need A Range
Journalism isn't about just getting one side and the other side. That's just enabling an argument. What we're trying to do is get a range of dies and perspectives, in hopes of capturing all the degrees of complexity of a story and discovering a larger truth as a result.
There are various types of sides we should get. For JRN 400, the instructors came up with some category terms to help illustrate a basic range of sides. Those include:
- Affected subjects: These are people affected by whatever action is central to the story. For example, for a story about East Lansing banning alcohol sales to students, an affected person would be a student. Are they ticked by this? Also affected are those who sell alcohol; what does this do to their livelihoods?
- Subject users: These would be people who take advantage or are disadvantaged by the action taking place. In addition to students and East Lansing liquor stores, this could include Lansing liquor stories: do they expect a surge in business as a result of the ban in E.L.?
- Subject drivers: Who is making the action happen? In this case, it would be the people making the decisions (the City Council, which sets city laws) and those enforcing the decisions (the police department).
- Subject experts: This would be a neutral expert, who is expert in the subject area but doesn't have a stake in this particular fight, or any particular interest in the outcome. They help the audience make sense of the various sides and their positions. For example, perhaps a political science prof could talk about local alcohol enforcement, since he or she is an expert on government. Or a history prof could talk about the history of prohibition in America and how well it's worked in general. Or a sociologist could talk about alcohol culture and how this impacts that. Please see the blog posts on neutral experts for more on these subjects.
- Subject observers: People who are part of the environment and not directly affected, but may have an interest in the outcome. Like East Lansing residents in general; are they happy that those damn kids can't get their drink on any longer?
- Subject examples: Could be any of the above, that you think best illustrates the impact of the story.
Your stories should have AT LEAST three of these categories covered.
Neutral Experts: WTF Is That?
Today, I'm going to introduce a new concept that you'll need for completing your self-reported out-of-class stories. And that concept is that of neutral experts.
Neutral experts are people who have a great deal of knowledge and/or expertise regarding the subject you're writing about, but importantly they don't have an interest in the outcome. It's someone who can offer analysis that helps readers decide which side of an issue is more credible. In a one-sided story, it helps readers evaluate whether the people you're writing about are on the up and up.
Think of it in terms of a game: you normally have one side and the other side, right? How you view the game depends on which side you're on. Unless you have a referee, that is. A neutral expert is sort of a referee, helping point on when one side is telling the truth and the other side is stretching it a bit -- or a lot.
Let's say you're doing a story on a new business coming to East Lansing. You'd certainly talk to the business owner, but he or she has an interest in telling you positive stuff, since they own the biz. You can talk to rival businesses, but they have an interest in making themselves look better than the new guy. You can talk to shoppers who do have a valid viewpoint, but they are not expert at economic development.
That's where a neutral expert like, say, a business school prof at MSU, can come in handy. That person doesn't have a stake in whether a business succeeds or fails, but they are expert at business, and can comment on the pros and cons not based on self-interest but rather on expertise. And that expertise helps a reader sort out all the competing perspectives, and decide which ones are credible and carry the most weight and relevance.
Most news stories at least attempt to include at least one neutral expert. And you can find a neutral expert about almost anything, no matter how obscure.
Let's look at this example: during the run-up to the 2008 presidential election, a lot was made about how the Obamas would fist-bump each other. The New York Times Sunday Magazine even did a story about it.
Here's how the story started:
Is this the end of high-five? On the night in June that Barack Obamaclinched the Democratic nomination, he and his wife, Michelle, exchanged what was variously described as a “closed-fist high five,” a “fist pound,” a “knuckle buckle” and a “fist jab.” Jonathan Tilove in The New Orleans Times-Picayune called the gesture “the dap heard ’round the world,” which he felt encapsulated “the new cultural trajectory of American politics.”
Believe it or not, they found an expert on fist-bumping. And that expert was right here. Let's continue the story:
Prof. Geneva Smitherman, director of African-American language study at Michigan State University, says: “Pound is when knuckles touch in a horizontal position. That’s the gesture that Michelle and Barack used.Dap is when the knuckles touch in a vertical position. Both gestures can be used as a greeting, to signal respect, agreement, bonding.”
Like many other schools, MSU -- in hopes of getting free publicity -- even makes it easy to find experts. The MSU News Office's Web site has an experts list, which you can link to here: http://news.msu.edu/experts/Results/?
Just looking at the first page, these are just some of the topics for which MSU can find you a neutral expert: wind power, renewable energy, water preservation, breast cancer, breast cancer education, medical education, microfinance, filmmaking, documentary production, sensors and nano-bisensor devices for biodefense, health diagnostics and theraputics, child welfare, biblical references and history, Samartian population, meteorology and climatology, Isreali-Palestinian conflict, Israeli politics, society and culture, international relations, U.S. foreign policy, school funding, school choice, school district building projects, the effects of mass communications, health communications, communications campaigns, international relations, the Middle East, Muslim issues, the early formation of galaxies, tax and expenditure policies, state and local public finance, poverty and income distribution, campus sustainability, Internet governance, new wireless technologies, telecommunications regulation and policy, bone and tissue engineering, labor markets, chaos theory, alternative dispute resolution, primitive stars, galaxy formation, labor unions and collective bargaining, international and domestic labor policy, work and family policy, flexible scheduling policy, tropical diseases, malaria, AIDS/HIV . . .
. . . and those are just a FEW of the subject areas!
You can also search by typing in a topic here: http://news.msu.edu/experts/
I took some general topics and looked for experts. Like Google, sometimes you have to try the same general term in different ways (like if you're searching for an expert in campus safety, you try that term, then campus, then safety, then police, and so on).
Under "campus living" I found one expert. For "transportation" I found two. There were three each for "housing" and "discrimination" and "elections." I found four each for "police" and "campus" and "drug." For "safety" I found 14! And "health" produced 35!
And you can filter by these general topic areas: agriculture and environment; arts and humanities; athletics; board and administration; business, economy, law and communications; education; family and social issues; health, medicine and veterinary medicine; international; science and technology; staff and faculty; students and campus life; tuition, costs and enrollment.Plus, there's always Google, right? And other schools as well. And think tanks. And private research institutions.
Wherever you find a good one, it's critical that you do. Journalism isn't about just getting both sides of the story. Getting one side and the other side and nothing else is just enabling a fight.
We're about trying to arrive at a verifiable version of the truth based on facts and checking out what people have to say, right? That's the role a neutral expert helps accomplish.
To paraphrase legendary baseball announcer and willful drunk Harry Caray -- and this might be the only smart thing he ever said in his life, God rest his soul -- there are three sides to every story: your side, my side, and the truth.
We need to get more than two out of three. We need all of 'em. And we need our out-of-class stories to cite AT LEAST one neutral expert!
So go find some neutral experts!
Neutral experts are people who have a great deal of knowledge and/or expertise regarding the subject you're writing about, but importantly they don't have an interest in the outcome. It's someone who can offer analysis that helps readers decide which side of an issue is more credible. In a one-sided story, it helps readers evaluate whether the people you're writing about are on the up and up.
Think of it in terms of a game: you normally have one side and the other side, right? How you view the game depends on which side you're on. Unless you have a referee, that is. A neutral expert is sort of a referee, helping point on when one side is telling the truth and the other side is stretching it a bit -- or a lot.
Let's say you're doing a story on a new business coming to East Lansing. You'd certainly talk to the business owner, but he or she has an interest in telling you positive stuff, since they own the biz. You can talk to rival businesses, but they have an interest in making themselves look better than the new guy. You can talk to shoppers who do have a valid viewpoint, but they are not expert at economic development.
That's where a neutral expert like, say, a business school prof at MSU, can come in handy. That person doesn't have a stake in whether a business succeeds or fails, but they are expert at business, and can comment on the pros and cons not based on self-interest but rather on expertise. And that expertise helps a reader sort out all the competing perspectives, and decide which ones are credible and carry the most weight and relevance.
Most news stories at least attempt to include at least one neutral expert. And you can find a neutral expert about almost anything, no matter how obscure.
Let's look at this example: during the run-up to the 2008 presidential election, a lot was made about how the Obamas would fist-bump each other. The New York Times Sunday Magazine even did a story about it.
Here's how the story started:
Is this the end of high-five? On the night in June that Barack Obamaclinched the Democratic nomination, he and his wife, Michelle, exchanged what was variously described as a “closed-fist high five,” a “fist pound,” a “knuckle buckle” and a “fist jab.” Jonathan Tilove in The New Orleans Times-Picayune called the gesture “the dap heard ’round the world,” which he felt encapsulated “the new cultural trajectory of American politics.”
Believe it or not, they found an expert on fist-bumping. And that expert was right here. Let's continue the story:
Prof. Geneva Smitherman, director of African-American language study at Michigan State University, says: “Pound is when knuckles touch in a horizontal position. That’s the gesture that Michelle and Barack used.Dap is when the knuckles touch in a vertical position. Both gestures can be used as a greeting, to signal respect, agreement, bonding.”
Dap started among black soldiers during the Vietnam War; to give “some dap” (not usually “a” dap) means “to offer kudos, congratulations”; Prof. James Peterson of Bucknell, a hip-hop historian, says he thinks it is rooted in dapper, “neat, fashionably smart.” Pound came out of hip-hop in the late 1980s. Fist bump came later: a 1996 note in the Sports Network wire service reported that Eddie Murray of the Baltimore Orioles was accepting congratulations from baseball teammates with “high-fives, handshakes or fist bumps.” Peterson says the new phrase robs the gesture of its cultural significance, which includes the Obamas’ “quiet but pronounced in-group affiliation with all of black America.”
Hand signals have a checkered history in politics, from Prime MinisterWinston Churchill’s V-for-victory sign to the famed photo of Gov. Nelson Rockefeller “giving the finger” to hecklers to the clenched-fist salute of “black power” to Lyndon Johnson’s fondness for “pressing the flesh.”
When Michelle Obama visited Barbara Walters on “The View” on ABC, the candidate’s wife sought to soften her image with “I have to be greeted properly. Fist bump, please. It is now my signature bump. . . . I got it from the young staff. That’s the new high-five.”
Colleges are notorious for being loaded with neutral experts (think of all your profs doing research, and all the TA's working on their thesis papers!) So really, there's no excuse for you NOT to find a neutral expert, especially here or at other schools.Like many other schools, MSU -- in hopes of getting free publicity -- even makes it easy to find experts. The MSU News Office's Web site has an experts list, which you can link to here: http://news.msu.edu/experts/Results/?
Just looking at the first page, these are just some of the topics for which MSU can find you a neutral expert: wind power, renewable energy, water preservation, breast cancer, breast cancer education, medical education, microfinance, filmmaking, documentary production, sensors and nano-bisensor devices for biodefense, health diagnostics and theraputics, child welfare, biblical references and history, Samartian population, meteorology and climatology, Isreali-Palestinian conflict, Israeli politics, society and culture, international relations, U.S. foreign policy, school funding, school choice, school district building projects, the effects of mass communications, health communications, communications campaigns, international relations, the Middle East, Muslim issues, the early formation of galaxies, tax and expenditure policies, state and local public finance, poverty and income distribution, campus sustainability, Internet governance, new wireless technologies, telecommunications regulation and policy, bone and tissue engineering, labor markets, chaos theory, alternative dispute resolution, primitive stars, galaxy formation, labor unions and collective bargaining, international and domestic labor policy, work and family policy, flexible scheduling policy, tropical diseases, malaria, AIDS/HIV . . .
. . . and those are just a FEW of the subject areas!
You can also search by typing in a topic here: http://news.msu.edu/experts/
I took some general topics and looked for experts. Like Google, sometimes you have to try the same general term in different ways (like if you're searching for an expert in campus safety, you try that term, then campus, then safety, then police, and so on).
Under "campus living" I found one expert. For "transportation" I found two. There were three each for "housing" and "discrimination" and "elections." I found four each for "police" and "campus" and "drug." For "safety" I found 14! And "health" produced 35!
And you can filter by these general topic areas: agriculture and environment; arts and humanities; athletics; board and administration; business, economy, law and communications; education; family and social issues; health, medicine and veterinary medicine; international; science and technology; staff and faculty; students and campus life; tuition, costs and enrollment.Plus, there's always Google, right? And other schools as well. And think tanks. And private research institutions.
Wherever you find a good one, it's critical that you do. Journalism isn't about just getting both sides of the story. Getting one side and the other side and nothing else is just enabling a fight.
We're about trying to arrive at a verifiable version of the truth based on facts and checking out what people have to say, right? That's the role a neutral expert helps accomplish.
To paraphrase legendary baseball announcer and willful drunk Harry Caray -- and this might be the only smart thing he ever said in his life, God rest his soul -- there are three sides to every story: your side, my side, and the truth.
We need to get more than two out of three. We need all of 'em. And we need our out-of-class stories to cite AT LEAST one neutral expert!
So go find some neutral experts!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)